PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGVD.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than IS0Z.DE's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XGVD.DE has underperformed IS0Z.DE with an annualized return of -0.99%, while IS0Z.DE has yielded a comparatively higher -0.58% annualized return.


XGVD.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
-0.99%

IS0Z.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.26%
1Y
0.54%
3Y*
1.18%
5Y*
-2.11%
10Y*
-0.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGVD.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged
-0.89%1.49%-0.44%3.58%-15.11%-3.15%4.33%4.52%-0.57%-0.09%
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.29%-1.88%0.75%4.39%-16.12%-0.07%2.03%7.04%1.73%-3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2012

0.72

The correlation between XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGVD.DE
XGVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0Z.DE
IS0Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGVD.DEIS0Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.01

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

0.09

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

0.19

-0.33

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the IS0Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGVD.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.06

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

-0.34

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

-0.10

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.05

+0.06

Drawdowns

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, roughly equal to the maximum IS0Z.DE drawdown of -21.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGVD.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-21.02%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-2.50%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-5.11%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-19.65%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

-21.02%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.92%

-15.06%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-7.48%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.21%

+0.09%

Volatility

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) is 1.38%, while iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0Z.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that XGVD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGVD.DEIS0Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.69%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

3.07%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

3.82%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

6.19%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

5.66%

-1.35%

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGVD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IS0Z.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGVD.DE vs. IS0Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGVD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than IS0Z.DE's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS0Z.DE
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.67%2.51%2.30%1.57%0.80%0.47%0.62%0.88%0.90%0.82%0.84%1.06%
XGVD.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged
2.73%2.55%2.71%1.79%2.86%1.60%1.01%0.89%0.65%0.00%0.93%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS0Z.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS0Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGVD.DE.

XGVD.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while IS0Z.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Government AAA-AA Capped Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGVD.DE and 0.20% for IS0Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGVD.DE and IS0Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer