PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (SPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGVD.DE achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPFB.DE's 0.61% return.


XGVD.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.93%
1Y
-0.18%
3Y*
0.74%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
-0.99%

SPFB.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XGVD.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged
-0.89%1.49%-0.44%3.58%-15.11%-3.15%4.33%4.52%0.76%
SPFB.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
0.61%4.84%2.82%5.74%-12.07%-1.58%4.34%6.46%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018

0.90

The correlation between XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGVD.DE
XGVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XGVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFB.DE
SPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (SPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGVD.DESPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.20

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.46

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

4.25

-4.39

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the SPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGVD.DESPFB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

1.12

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.05

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.34

-0.23

Drawdowns

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, which is greater than SPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGVD.DESPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.37%

-15.78%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-2.31%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-3.59%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-15.55%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.92%

-1.01%

-14.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-4.52%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.79%

+0.51%

Volatility

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged (XGVD.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (SPFB.DE) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGVD.DESPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.39%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.47%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

3.01%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

4.35%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.31%

3.84%

+0.47%

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGVD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPFB.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGVD.DE vs. SPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

XGVD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than SPFB.DE's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPFB.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.09%3.07%2.70%1.91%1.48%1.18%1.51%1.70%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGVD.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR hedged
2.73%2.55%2.71%1.79%2.86%1.60%1.01%0.89%0.65%0.00%0.93%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGVD.DE.

XGVD.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while SPFB.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGVD.DE and 0.10% for SPFB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGVD.DE and SPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer