XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XGSI.L (Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged) and HBKS.L (HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD) are both Global Bonds funds - XGSI.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD while HBKS.L tracks the FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XGSI.L returned 2.05% vs 4.14% for HBKS.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGSI.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HBKS.L.

Performance

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XGSI.L is traded in USD, while HBKS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HBKS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSI.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than HBKS.L's 0.44% return.

XGSI.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: -0.28%
• 1Y: 2.05%
• 3Y*: 2.69%
• 5Y*: -0.67%
• 10Y*: —

HBKS.L

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XGSI.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged	-0.36%	3.99%	1.24%	4.88%
HBKS.L HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD	0.44%	7.18%	2.74%	3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XGSI.L and HBKS.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023	0.28

The correlation between XGSI.L and HBKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSI.L

XGSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XGSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
XGSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XGSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XGSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

HBKS.L

HBKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
HBKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HBKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
HBKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
HBKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
HBKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGSI.L	HBKS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.69	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.98	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.12	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	1.04	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	3.55	-1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the HBKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSI.L and HBKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGSI.L	HBKS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	0.69	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.99	-0.77

Drawdowns

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSI.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, which is greater than HBKS.L's maximum drawdown of -3.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSI.L and HBKS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGSI.L	HBKS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.29%	-3.97%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.15%	-3.97%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-1.56%	-4.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-0.89%	-4.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	1.16%	-0.03%

Volatility

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) is 1.47%, while HSBC Global Sukuk UCITS ETF C USD (HBKS.L) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that XGSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGSI.L	HBKS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	2.14%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.87%	5.03%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	5.95%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.30%	5.18%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.77%	5.18%	-0.41%

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HBKS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XGSI.L vs. HBKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGSI.L nor HBKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGSI.L and HBKS.L in my portfolio?

XGSI.L and HBKS.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XGSI.L or HBKS.L?

On fees, XGSI.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGSI.L or HBKS.L?

XGSI.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HBKS.L.

What is the main difference between XGSI.L and HBKS.L?

XGSI.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while HBKS.L tracks FTSE IdealRatings Sukuk Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGSI.L and 0.40% for HBKS.L.