PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGSI.L is traded in USD, while EGOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EGOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSI.L achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than EGOG.L's -0.39% return.


XGSI.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.02%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*

EGOG.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
0.93%
1Y
0.83%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XGSI.L
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged
-0.43%3.99%1.24%5.84%-13.31%-2.49%-0.05%
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
-0.39%11.03%0.81%8.78%-20.85%-3.76%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XGSI.L and EGOG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2020

0.18

Over the past year, XGSI.L and EGOG.L have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSI.L
XGSI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EGOG.L
EGOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGSI.LEGOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.03

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.26

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

0.55

+1.35

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSI.L and EGOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGSI.LEGOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.13

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.27

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.15

+0.38

Drawdowns

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSI.L drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum EGOG.L drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSI.L and EGOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGSI.LEGOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-32.04%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-5.30%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.29%

-10.60%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.39%

-32.04%

+15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-9.84%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-12.45%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

3.39%

-2.26%

Volatility

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged (XGSI.L) is 1.48%, while UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that XGSI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGSI.LEGOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.87%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

7.62%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

10.76%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.30%

20.35%

-15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

19.84%

-15.07%

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EGOG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGSI.L vs. EGOG.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EGOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
2.71%2.91%2.30%1.44%0.44%0.17%
XGSI.L
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 3C USD hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGSI.L and EGOG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EGOG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EGOG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGSI.L.

XGSI.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while EGOG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: DWS and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGSI.L and 0.20% for EGOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGSI.L and EGOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer