PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGSG.L is traded in GBp, while GLAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSG.L achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than GLAU.L's 0.82% return.


XGSG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
-0.11%
5Y*
-3.22%
10Y*
-1.29%

GLAU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
1.48%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
1.60%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XGSG.L
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged
-1.67%0.95%-1.45%3.09%-16.07%-4.09%4.20%4.93%1.02%
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
0.82%-2.83%5.39%0.30%-1.66%0.35%1.56%5.41%4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XGSG.L and GLAU.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSG.L
XGSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XGSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAU.L
GLAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGSG.LGLAU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.15

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

1.05

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

2.39

-3.24

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the GLAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSG.L and GLAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGSG.LGLAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.78

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

0.37

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.39

-0.50

Drawdowns

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than GLAU.L's maximum drawdown of -13.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSG.L and GLAU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGSG.LGLAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-13.01%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-5.67%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.86%

-8.88%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.36%

-12.52%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.27%

-4.88%

-15.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-6.32%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

5.38%

-3.92%

Volatility

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) is 1.48%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that XGSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGSG.LGLAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.86%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

5.44%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

7.59%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.52%

11.16%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

12.92%

-8.24%

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGSG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLAU.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGSG.L vs. GLAU.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GLAU.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAU.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged
3.15%3.02%2.71%2.02%1.40%1.21%1.51%1.25%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSG.L
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGSG.L and GLAU.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGSG.L.

XGSG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGSG.L and 0.10% for GLAU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGSG.L and GLAU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer