GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L
GLAU.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged) and PRIG.L (Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Global Bonds funds - GLAU.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD while PRIG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLAU.L returned 0.68%/yr vs -3.23%/yr for PRIG.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLAU.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIG.L.
Performance
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLAU.L is traded in USD, while PRIG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAU.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than PRIG.L's -1.17% return.
GLAU.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
PRIG.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- 1Y
- 0.61%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 0.16% | 4.62% | 3.58% | 6.07% | -11.13% | -1.01% | 5.46% | 6.58% |
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) | -1.17% | 7.34% | -3.43% | 4.13% | -18.08% | -6.76% | 9.21% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAU.L and PRIG.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GLAU.L and PRIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
Communication Services
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
Healthcare
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Energy
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Utilities
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Industrials
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Technology
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
Real Estate
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Basic Materials
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLAU.L
PRIG.L
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) and Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLAU.L | PRIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.02 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 0.14 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | 0.35 | +4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLAU.L | PRIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.10 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.40 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | -0.10 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum PRIG.L drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAU.L and PRIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAU.L | PRIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -29.12% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.36% | -4.27% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.11% | -8.06% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.58% | -26.77% | +12.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -18.98% | +17.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -13.97% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.75% | -0.91% |
Volatility
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (GLAU.L) is 1.55%, while Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that GLAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAU.L | PRIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 1.98% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 4.56% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60% | 6.31% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 8.12% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 7.97% | -0.93% |
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLAU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIG.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLAU.L vs. PRIG.L - Dividend Comparison
GLAU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than PRIG.L's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAU.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.71% | 2.02% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.51% | 1.25% | 0.89% |
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) | 2.99% | 2.96% | 2.31% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.50% | 1.75% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAU.L and PRIG.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLAU.L.
GLAU.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD, while PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAU.L and 0.05% for PRIG.L.
Find the right allocation for GLAU.L and PRIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer