PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGSG.L is traded in GBp, while IGLH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGSG.L achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than IGLH.L's 2.41% return.


XGSG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
-0.11%
5Y*
-3.22%
10Y*
-1.29%

IGLH.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.13%
YTD
2.41%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
1.81%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XGSG.L
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged
-1.67%0.95%-1.45%3.09%-16.07%-4.09%4.20%4.93%0.16%
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.41%0.63%0.79%4.70%-13.61%-2.47%5.04%5.48%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XGSG.L and IGLH.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between XGSG.L and IGLH.L has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGSG.L
XGSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XGSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLH.L
IGLH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGSG.LIGLH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.08

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

0.52

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

1.55

-2.40

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGSG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGSG.L and IGLH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGSG.LIGLH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

0.33

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

-0.21

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.06

-0.17

Drawdowns

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, which is greater than IGLH.L's maximum drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSG.L and IGLH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGSG.LIGLH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-18.45%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-3.39%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.86%

-4.52%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.36%

-16.90%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.27%

-9.40%

-10.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.36%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.14%

+0.32%

Volatility

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGSG.LIGLH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.54%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

4.80%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

5.35%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.52%

5.43%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

4.75%

-0.07%

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XGSG.L and IGLH.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGSG.L vs. IGLH.L - Dividend Comparison

XGSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IGLH.L's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.98%2.91%2.33%1.40%0.73%0.55%0.97%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGSG.L
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGSG.L and IGLH.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGSG.L and IGLH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGSG.L and IGLH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer