XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L
XGSG.L (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XGSG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGSG.L returned -1.29%/yr vs 22.43%/yr for CNX1.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. XGSG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.
Performance
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGSG.L achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XGSG.L has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of -1.29%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.43% annualized return.
XGSG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.11%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- -1.29%
CNX1.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 41.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 22.43%
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGSG.L Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged | -1.67% | 0.95% | -1.45% | 3.09% | -16.07% | -4.09% | 4.20% | 4.93% | 0.08% | 0.12% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.85% | 11.57% | 28.51% | 47.71% | -25.53% | 29.50% | 43.24% | 33.63% | 4.62% | 20.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGSG.L and CNX1.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2013 | -0.07 |
The correlation between XGSG.L and CNX1.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGSG.L
CNX1.L
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGSG.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.50 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.76 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 11.10 | -11.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGSG.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.82 | -3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.58 | 0.98 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | 1.16 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.14 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGSG.L and CNX1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGSG.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -27.56% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.73% | -11.03% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | -24.56% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.36% | -27.56% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.52% | -27.56% | +4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.27% | -0.63% | -19.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -4.57% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 3.75% | -2.29% |
Volatility
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged (XGSG.L) is 1.48%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that XGSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGSG.L | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 4.13% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 10.38% | -7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 14.70% | -9.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 19.16% | -13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 19.44% | -14.76% |
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGSG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGSG.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
XGSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGSG.L Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 2D GBP Hedged | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGSG.L and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGSG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGSG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.
XGSG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. XGSG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGSG.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.
Find the right allocation for XGSG.L and CNX1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer