XGLD.L vs. GOOG
XGLD.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while GOOG (Alphabet Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L returned 13.32%/yr vs 25.80%/yr for GOOG. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 13.32%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.80% annualized return.
XGLD.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
GOOG
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 112.81%
- 3Y*
- 42.00%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 25.80%
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 3.08% | 64.60% | 25.87% | 13.37% | -0.24% | -4.19% | 24.11% | 18.35% | -1.36% | 11.68% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 13.43% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -38.67% | 65.17% | 31.03% | 29.10% | -1.03% | 35.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLD.L and GOOG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014 | 0.01 |
The correlation between XGLD.L and GOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLD.L vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank
XGLD.L
GOOG
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLD.L | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.64 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 5.47 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 19.89 | -15.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLD.L | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 3.98 | -2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.77 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.82 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOG drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and GOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLD.L | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.19% | -44.60% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -20.75% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.08% | -29.35% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -44.60% | +23.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.21% | -44.60% | +23.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.45% | -10.87% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -8.89% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 5.69% | +1.11% |
Volatility
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) is 6.46%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that XGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLD.L | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 8.08% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 20.16% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.82% | 28.59% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 31.10% | -13.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 28.99% | -13.53% |
Dividends
XGLD.L vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison
XGLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.32% |
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLD.L and GOOG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XGLD.L and GOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer