XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE
XGLD.L (Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC) and 18MF.DE (Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGLD.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while 18MF.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L returned 13.32%/yr vs 25.79%/yr for 18MF.DE. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. XGLD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for 18MF.DE.
Performance
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGLD.L is traded in USD, while 18MF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 18MF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGLD.L achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than 18MF.DE's 20.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XGLD.L has underperformed 18MF.DE with an annualized return of 13.32%, while 18MF.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 25.79% annualized return.
XGLD.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
18MF.DE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.97%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- 25.79%
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGLD.L Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC | 3.08% | 64.60% | 25.87% | 13.37% | -0.24% | -4.19% | 24.11% | 18.35% | -1.36% | 11.68% |
18MF.DE Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF | 20.22% | 14.77% | 54.75% | 47.65% | -37.10% | 73.35% | 15.57% | 74.05% | -10.18% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGLD.L and 18MF.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | -0.05 |
The correlation between XGLD.L and 18MF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGLD.L
18MF.DE
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) and Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGLD.L | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 3.39 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 13.14 | -8.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGLD.L | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.36 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.71 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.82 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, smaller than the maximum 18MF.DE drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGLD.L and 18MF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGLD.L | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.19% | -59.96% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -15.66% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.08% | -40.04% | +21.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -40.04% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.21% | -59.96% | +38.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.45% | -0.89% | -15.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -8.89% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 4.05% | +2.75% |
Volatility
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Gold ETC (XGLD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) at 5.67%. This indicates that XGLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 18MF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGLD.L | 18MF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 5.67% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 15.41% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.82% | 22.64% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 30.73% | -13.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 31.98% | -16.52% |
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGLD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 18MF.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGLD.L vs. 18MF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGLD.L nor 18MF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGLD.L and 18MF.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGLD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for 18MF.DE.
XGLD.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while 18MF.DE is Leveraged Equities. XGLD.L tracks Gold, while 18MF.DE tracks MSCI USA Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGLD.L and 0.50% for 18MF.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGLD.L and 18MF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer