XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L
XGIU.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C) and IEEM.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - XGIU.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while IEEM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGIU.L returned 1.97%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for IEEM.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGIU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IEEM.L.
Performance
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGIU.L achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than IEEM.L's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XGIU.L has underperformed IEEM.L with an annualized return of 1.97%, while IEEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
XGIU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
IEEM.L
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 55.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C | 1.28% | 1.16% | -1.40% | -0.59% | -12.25% | 3.51% | 7.89% | 4.14% | 3.71% | 1.12% |
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 25.90% | 26.66% | 9.88% | 3.86% | -9.90% | -1.38% | 15.96% | 12.64% | -9.08% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGIU.L and IEEM.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGIU.L
IEEM.L
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGIU.L | IEEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.60 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 4.93 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | 17.58 | -14.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGIU.L | IEEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 3.23 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.57 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.64 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGIU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, smaller than the maximum IEEM.L drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGIU.L and IEEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGIU.L | IEEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -53.22% | +33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -11.12% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.40% | -15.47% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.08% | -23.27% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.08% | -26.63% | +6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.69% | -2.43% | -12.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -10.41% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 3.13% | -1.57% |
Volatility
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) is 2.42%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) (IEEM.L) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that XGIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGIU.L | IEEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 7.42% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.99% | 14.55% | -10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.10% | 17.03% | -11.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 16.32% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 18.11% | -6.47% |
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGIU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IEEM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGIU.L vs. IEEM.L - Dividend Comparison
XGIU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEEM.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.01% | 2.48% | 2.86% | 2.91% | 3.40% | 2.74% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 2.51% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 3.38% |
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGIU.L and IEEM.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGIU.L.
XGIU.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IEEM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XGIU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while IEEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGIU.L and 0.18% for IEEM.L.
Find the right allocation for XGIU.L and IEEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer