XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L).
XGIU.L and IDTP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGIU.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013. IDTP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. Both XGIU.L and IDTP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGIU.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C | 1.26% | 1.16% | -1.40% | -0.59% | -12.25% | 3.51% | 7.89% | 4.14% | 3.71% | 1.12% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.65% | -0.68% | 3.94% | -1.47% | -2.38% | 7.17% | 7.72% | 4.55% | 4.42% | -5.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGIU.L is traded in GBp, while IDTP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGIU.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than IDTP.L's 1.65% return.
XGIU.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 1.81%
- 3Y*
- -0.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTP.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGIU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGIU.L
IDTP.L
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGIU.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.02 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 0.08 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.01 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.15 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 0.27 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGIU.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.02 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.23 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGIU.L and IDTP.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGIU.L nor IDTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGIU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGIU.L and IDTP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGIU.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -15.12% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.29% | -4.14% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.08% | -15.12% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.70% | -1.69% | -13.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -4.25% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.23% | +0.88% |
Volatility
XGIU.L vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XGIU.L) is 2.02%, while iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that XGIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGIU.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 2.92% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | 5.29% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 7.94% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 9.14% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 10.75% | +1.04% |