IDTP.L vs. SHY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY).
IDTP.L and SHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDTP.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. SHY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2002. Both IDTP.L and SHY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDTP.L or SHY.
Performance
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDTP.L achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than SHY's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IDTP.L has outperformed SHY with an annualized return of 2.13%, while SHY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.18% annualized return.
IDTP.L
2.50%
-1.50%
2.62%
5.94%
1.87%
2.13%
SHY
3.28%
-0.35%
2.78%
4.82%
1.18%
1.18%
Key characteristics
| IDTP.L | SHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 2.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.60 | 4.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.20 | 1.55 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.46 | 2.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.39 | 13.56 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.34% | 0.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.75% | 1.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.12% | -5.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.76% | -0.86% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDTP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SHY's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between IDTP.L and SHY is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Dividend Comparison
IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHY iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.86% | 2.99% | 1.30% | 0.26% | 0.94% | 2.12% | 1.72% | 0.98% | 0.72% | 0.54% | 0.36% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDTP.L drawdown since its inception was -15.12%, which is greater than SHY's maximum drawdown of -5.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDTP.L and SHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDTP.L vs. SHY - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) at 0.41%. This indicates that IDTP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.