PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILE.L vs. TIPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.28%2.28%-2.12%1.92%-19.12%4.65%7.55%5.80%-2.82%1.14%
TIPG.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.94%-5.62%8.74%-0.13%-7.07%14.28%1.42%12.19%1.08%1.01%
Different Trading Currencies

GILE.L is traded in EUR, while TIPG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILE.L achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than TIPG.L's 1.94% return.


GILE.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.57%
1Y
1.12%
3Y*
-0.18%
5Y*
-2.39%
10Y*

TIPG.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.06%
1Y
-3.60%
3Y*
1.08%
5Y*
1.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TIPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILE.L
GILE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GILE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GILE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TIPG.L
TIPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILE.LTIPG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.21

-0.45

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

-0.54

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.93

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

-0.34

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.88

-0.50

+1.38

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILE.L and TIPG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILE.LTIPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.45

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.19

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.26

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between GILE.L and TIPG.L is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Dividend Comparison

GILE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than TIPG.L's 1.10% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.07%1.11%1.05%0.91%0.86%0.69%1.12%2.13%0.41%0.00%
TIPG.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.10%1.12%0.88%0.72%0.70%0.55%0.65%0.78%0.77%0.82%

Drawdowns

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILE.L drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, which is greater than TIPG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILE.L and TIPG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GILE.LTIPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-15.73%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-6.91%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-15.73%

-8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.80%

-7.42%

-11.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-7.20%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

3.79%

-2.71%

Volatility

GILE.L vs. TIPG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GILE.LTIPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.21%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

4.24%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

8.03%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.78%

8.64%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.19%

9.68%

-2.49%