PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGII.DE vs. THNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGII.DE is traded in EUR, while THNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the THNQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGII.DE achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 44.31% return.


XGII.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.72%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
0.11%

THNQ

1D
-1.09%
1M
19.91%
YTD
44.31%
6M
39.64%
1Y
73.24%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XGII.DE
Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged
1.07%2.36%-2.05%1.74%-19.09%4.43%4.84%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
44.31%14.43%26.66%52.11%-36.11%17.26%40.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XGII.DE and THNQ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGII.DE vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGII.DE
XGII.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XGII.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGII.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGII.DETHNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.12

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

11.85

-9.60

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGII.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGII.DE and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGII.DETHNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.81

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.67

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.79

-0.67

Drawdowns

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGII.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -43.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGII.DE and THNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGII.DETHNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.58%

-43.38%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-17.87%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-33.62%

+27.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-43.38%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.13%

-3.00%

-15.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-13.73%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

6.20%

-5.15%

Volatility

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged (XGII.DE) is 1.21%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that XGII.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGII.DETHNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

8.21%

-7.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

19.93%

-17.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

26.19%

-22.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

28.28%

-20.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.12%

27.78%

-20.66%

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGII.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGII.DE vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

XGII.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than THNQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.14%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGII.DE
Xtrackers II Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF - EUR Hedged
1.00%0.94%1.02%0.68%0.97%0.45%1.44%0.91%0.63%0.00%3.87%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGII.DE and THNQ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGII.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGII.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

XGII.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while THNQ is Technology Equities. XGII.DE tracks Bloomberg World Government Inflation-Linked Bond (EUR Hedged), while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XGII.DE and 0.68% for THNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGII.DE and THNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer