PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGES.L vs. GNOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGES.L
Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-3.32%11.22%-1.38%-7.92%-8.46%
GNOG.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
-1.16%12.03%-16.98%-11.35%-15.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGES.L achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than GNOG.L's -1.16% return.


XGES.L

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
4.92%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
0.30%
5Y*
10Y*

GNOG.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
14.72%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
-4.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGES.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGES.L
XGES.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XGES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XGES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOG.L
GNOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGES.LGNOG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.23

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

1.79

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.22

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.79

6.61

-2.82

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGES.L and GNOG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGES.LGNOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.23

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

-0.45

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between XGES.L and GNOG.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGES.L nor GNOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGES.L drawdown since its inception was -35.79%, smaller than the maximum GNOG.L drawdown of -67.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGES.L and GNOG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XGES.LGNOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.79%

-67.50%

+31.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

-17.16%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-48.74%

+33.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-44.07%

+26.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

5.75%

-1.20%

Volatility

XGES.L vs. GNOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) is 6.30%, while Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that XGES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XGES.LGNOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

9.63%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

21.09%

-8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

29.88%

-10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

31.32%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

31.32%

-13.20%