XGES.L vs. XDWT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L).
XGES.L and XDWT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGES.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. XDWT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. Both XGES.L and XDWT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XGES.L or XDWT.L.
Performance
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGES.L achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 28.75% return.
XGES.L
-2.48%
-5.77%
-3.43%
-12.97%
N/A
N/A
XDWT.L
28.75%
0.85%
13.48%
37.34%
21.86%
N/A
Key characteristics
| XGES.L | XDWT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.52 | 1.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.84 | 2.36 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.22 | 2.37 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.10 | 8.38 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.74% | 4.39% |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.11% | 20.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.90% | -35.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.31% | -2.47% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGES.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between XGES.L and XDWT.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGES.L nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGES.L drawdown since its inception was -37.90%, which is greater than XDWT.L's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGES.L and XDWT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XGES.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.