XGES.L vs. WHCE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L).
XGES.L and WHCE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGES.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. WHCE.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P World ESG Enhanced Health Care Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. Both XGES.L and WHCE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XGES.L Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -3.32% | 11.22% | -1.38% | -7.62% |
WHCE.L Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc | -2.70% | 7.68% | 3.32% | 0.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
XGES.L is traded in GBP, while WHCE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WHCE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGES.L achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than WHCE.L's -2.70% return.
XGES.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- 0.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WHCE.L
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGES.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WHCE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L — Risk / Return Rank
XGES.L
WHCE.L
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) and Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGES.L | WHCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.12 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.28 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.35 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 0.69 | +3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGES.L | WHCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.12 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.20 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between XGES.L and WHCE.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGES.L nor WHCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGES.L drawdown since its inception was -35.79%, which is greater than WHCE.L's maximum drawdown of -20.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGES.L and WHCE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGES.L | WHCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.79% | -20.11% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.81% | -10.36% | -3.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -7.30% | -7.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -5.96% | -12.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 4.32% | +0.23% |
Volatility
XGES.L vs. WHCE.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGES.L) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Invesco S&P World Health Care ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WHCE.L) at 5.19%. This indicates that XGES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XGES.L | WHCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 5.19% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 10.12% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.58% | 17.02% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 13.63% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 13.63% | +4.49% |