PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) and SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GNOG.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF
-1.16%12.03%-16.98%-11.35%-13.86%
HEAW.L
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
-2.68%7.46%2.52%-2.05%5.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNOG.L achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than HEAW.L's -2.68% return.


GNOG.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
14.72%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
-4.91%
5Y*
10Y*

HEAW.L

1D
1.16%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
5.46%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNOG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HEAW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNOG.L
GNOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HEAW.L
HEAW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HEAW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) and SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNOG.LHEAW.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.19

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

0.37

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.42

+1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

0.83

+5.78

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the HEAW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNOG.L and HEAW.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNOG.LHEAW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.19

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.21

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between GNOG.L and HEAW.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GNOG.L nor HEAW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNOG.L drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than HEAW.L's maximum drawdown of -18.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOG.L and HEAW.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GNOG.LHEAW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.50%

-18.85%

-48.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.16%

-10.30%

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.74%

-5.95%

-42.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.07%

-5.49%

-38.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

4.77%

+0.98%

Volatility

GNOG.L vs. HEAW.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF (GNOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAW.L) at 4.26%. This indicates that GNOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEAW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GNOG.LHEAW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.63%

4.26%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

8.88%

+12.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.88%

15.32%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.32%

12.97%

+18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.32%

12.97%

+18.35%