PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGEN.DE vs. XSOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGEN.DE is traded in EUR, while XSOE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XSOE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGEN.DE achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than XSOE's 28.15% return.


XGEN.DE

1D
3.92%
1M
6.45%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-3.78%
1Y
22.37%
3Y*
1.39%
5Y*
10Y*

XSOE

1D
-1.14%
1M
7.26%
YTD
28.15%
6M
29.93%
1Y
48.70%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-1.40%7.38%2.95%-5.84%-9.98%
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
28.15%14.62%14.09%6.97%-9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XGEN.DE and XSOE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGEN.DE
XGEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XGEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XGEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XSOE
XSOE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XSOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XSOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGEN.DEXSOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.49

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.58

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

16.45

-12.85

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the XSOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGEN.DE and XSOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGEN.DEXSOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.64

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.44

-0.54

Drawdowns

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, which is greater than XSOE's maximum drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGEN.DE and XSOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGEN.DEXSOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.58%

-33.23%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-10.68%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.21%

-19.82%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.86%

-2.16%

-12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-13.43%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

2.97%

+3.22%

Volatility

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) is 6.48%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that XGEN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGEN.DEXSOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

7.79%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

15.82%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

18.55%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.68%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

19.90%

-1.24%

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGEN.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XSOE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGEN.DE vs. XSOE - Dividend Comparison

XGEN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSOE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.29%1.50%1.44%1.78%2.53%1.36%1.02%2.01%1.56%0.65%1.43%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGEN.DE and XSOE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGEN.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XSOE.

XGEN.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XSOE is Emerging Markets Equities. XGEN.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Genomic Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XSOE tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XGEN.DE and 0.32% for XSOE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGEN.DE and XSOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer