XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XGEN.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) and XG7U.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XGEN.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Genomic Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XG7U.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XGEN.DE returned 1.39%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XG7U.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XGEN.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XG7U.L.

Performance

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XGEN.DE is traded in EUR, while XG7U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XG7U.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGEN.DE achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than XG7U.L's 2.68% return.

XGEN.DE

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: 6.45%
• YTD: -1.40%
• 6M: -3.78%
• 1Y: 22.37%
• 3Y*: 1.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XG7U.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: 0.16%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: 1.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XGEN.DE Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	-1.40%	7.38%	2.95%	-5.84%	-9.98%
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged	2.68%	-7.75%	6.12%	1.01%	-9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XGEN.DE and XG7U.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022	0.13

The correlation between XGEN.DE and XG7U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGEN.DE

XGEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 32
XGEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
XGEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XGEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
XGEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XGEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

XG7U.L

XG7U.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XG7U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
XG7U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XG7U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XG7U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XGEN.DE	XG7U.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.37	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	0.56	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.07	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	0.55	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	1.26	+2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGEN.DE and XG7U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XGEN.DE	XG7U.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	0.37	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.31	-0.42

Drawdowns

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, which is greater than XG7U.L's maximum drawdown of -19.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGEN.DE and XG7U.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XGEN.DE	XG7U.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.58%	-19.81%	-17.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	-4.62%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.21%	-11.92%	-16.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.86%	-15.31%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.44%	-8.27%	-11.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.19%	2.02%	+4.17%

Volatility

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Genomic Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XGEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) at 1.48%. This indicates that XGEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XG7U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XGEN.DE	XG7U.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	1.48%	+5.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.73%	4.91%	+8.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	6.95%	+11.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.66%	10.06%	+8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	9.68%	+8.98%

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGEN.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XG7U.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XGEN.DE vs. XG7U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGEN.DE nor XG7U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XGEN.DE and XG7U.L in my portfolio?

XGEN.DE and XG7U.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XGEN.DE or XG7U.L?

On fees, XG7U.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XGEN.DE or XG7U.L?

XG7U.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XGEN.DE.

What is the main difference between XGEN.DE and XG7U.L?

XGEN.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XG7U.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XGEN.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Genomic Innovation Select ESG Screened 100, while XG7U.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XGEN.DE and 0.25% for XG7U.L.