PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while SGDJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGDJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly higher than SGDJ's -7.11% return.


XGDU.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
-8.80%
YTD
-5.61%
6M
-6.76%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
18.72%
10Y*

SGDJ

1D
0.42%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-7.11%
6M
-10.04%
1Y
71.97%
3Y*
45.53%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XGDU.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities
-5.61%49.09%34.21%9.43%6.99%3.80%-10.64%
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
-7.11%141.87%27.23%3.46%-23.12%-8.77%59.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XGDU.DE and SGDJ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020

0.55

The correlation between XGDU.DE and SGDJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGDU.DE
XGDU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGDU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGDU.DESGDJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

2.05

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

5.28

-2.80

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGDU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the SGDJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGDU.DE and SGDJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, smaller than the maximum SGDJ drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and SGDJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGDU.DESGDJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.01%

-59.10%

+37.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.01%

-35.31%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-35.31%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

-46.84%

+24.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.91%

-31.88%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-23.78%

+16.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

13.68%

-4.19%

Volatility

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) is 8.00%, while Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that XGDU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGDU.DESGDJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

18.01%

-10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.36%

40.76%

-19.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.53%

48.89%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

38.05%

-19.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

38.72%

-19.96%

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDJ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGDU.DE vs. SGDJ - Dividend Comparison

XGDU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
9.31%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
XGDU.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XGDU.DE and SGDJ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

XGDU.DE tracks Gold, while SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.50% for SGDJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and SGDJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer