XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and RM8U.DE (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both Precious Metals funds tracking the Gold, from Xtrackers and HANetf respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGDU.DE returned 19.58%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for RM8U.DE. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RM8U.DE.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than RM8U.DE's 2.70% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 30.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.58%
- 10Y*
- —
RM8U.DE
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 30.96%
- 3Y*
- 27.86%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- —
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 2.16% | 49.11% | 34.18% | 9.42% | 7.01% | 3.80% | -2.93% |
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 2.70% | 48.89% | 34.03% | 9.20% | 6.98% | 3.69% | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and RM8U.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020 | 1.00 |
The correlation between XGDU.DE and RM8U.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
RM8U.DE
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGDU.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.81 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 4.58 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGDU.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, roughly equal to the maximum RM8U.DE drawdown of -18.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and RM8U.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -18.51% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -16.54% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -15.01% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -6.13% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 6.55% | -0.07% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) at 5.04%. This indicates that XGDU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RM8U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | RM8U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 5.04% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.20% | 20.04% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 23.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 15.99% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 16.17% | -0.39% |
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RM8U.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. RM8U.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGDU.DE nor RM8U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, XGDU.DE and RM8U.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for RM8U.DE.
Both ETFs track Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.22% for RM8U.DE.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and RM8U.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer