XGDU.DE vs. IAUI
XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XGDU.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. XGDU.DE is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. Over the past year, XGDU.DE returned 23.53% vs 13.98% for IAUI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGDU.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XGDU.DE is traded in EUR, while IAUI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAUI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGDU.DE achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's -4.66% return.
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- 23.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.91%
- 5Y*
- 18.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -8.09%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | -5.61% | 26.67% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -4.66% | 16.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGDU.DE and IAUI is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XGDU.DE and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
XGDU.DE
IAUI
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGDU.DE | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.69 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 2.07 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGDU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -20.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGDU.DE and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGDU.DE | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -20.23% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.01% | -20.23% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.91% | -19.52% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -4.15% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.49% | 6.78% | +2.71% |
Volatility
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) at 7.45%. This indicates that XGDU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGDU.DE | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 7.45% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 18.74% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.53% | 20.41% | +12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 20.05% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 20.05% | -1.29% |
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGDU.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGDU.DE vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
XGDU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 14.06% | 6.88% |
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGDU.DE and IAUI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
XGDU.DE is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XGDU.DE and 0.78% for IAUI.
Find the right allocation for XGDU.DE and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer