XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO
XGD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF) and MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) are both exchange-traded funds - XGD.TO is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD, while MNS.TO is a Silver fund tracking the N/A (Physical Bullion). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XGD.TO returned 14.79%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for MNS.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XGD.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MNS.TO.
Performance
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XGD.TO has underperformed MNS.TO with an annualized return of 14.79%, while MNS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.
XGD.TO
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 67.78%
- 3Y*
- 43.11%
- 5Y*
- 22.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
MNS.TO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 6M
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- 101.71%
- 3Y*
- 47.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 3.35% | 144.45% | 19.63% | 3.91% | -3.10% | -5.81% | 21.10% | 40.18% | -4.10% | 0.96% |
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | -8.40% | 161.12% | 41.73% | -5.85% | 5.27% | -15.46% | 45.70% | 9.85% | -1.65% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGD.TO and MNS.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2012 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XGD.TO and MNS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XGD.TO
MNS.TO
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XGD.TO | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.67 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 5.94 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XGD.TO | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.89 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.29 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than MNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and MNS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGD.TO | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.55% | -51.12% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.95% | -38.31% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.95% | -38.31% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | -38.31% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.96% | -42.02% | -4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.49% | -31.98% | +8.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.30% | -28.15% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.93% | 17.19% | -6.26% |
Volatility
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) is 14.43%, while Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) has a volatility of 15.55%. This indicates that XGD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGD.TO | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.43% | 15.55% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.40% | 52.13% | -17.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.86% | 54.03% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.64% | 34.67% | -2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 32.05% | +1.33% |
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than MNS.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XGD.TO vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.93% | 1.49% | 1.80% | 1.38% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.25% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XGD.TO and MNS.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNS.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.
XGD.TO is categorized as Precious Metals, while MNS.TO is Silver. XGD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD, while MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Royal Canadian Mint. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XGD.TO and 0.45% for MNS.TO.
Find the right allocation for XGD.TO and MNS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer