PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGD.TO vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XGD.TO is traded in CAD, while GDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's 0.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XGD.TO having a 14.79% annualized return and GDX not far ahead at 14.81%.


XGD.TO

1D
-2.80%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.35%
6M
8.72%
1Y
67.78%
3Y*
43.11%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*
14.79%

GDX

1D
-3.07%
1M
1.22%
YTD
0.36%
6M
5.21%
1Y
63.35%
3Y*
42.64%
5Y*
22.08%
10Y*
14.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
3.35%144.45%19.63%3.91%-3.10%-5.81%21.10%40.18%-4.10%0.96%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.36%143.09%20.14%7.55%-2.52%-10.34%21.57%32.97%-1.03%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XGD.TO and GDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.96

The correlation between XGD.TO and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XGD.TO
GDX

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XGD.TO
100.0%
GDX
100.0%

Communication Services

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Energy

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Financial Services

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Industrials

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Technology

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Utilities

XGD.TO

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGD.TO vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XGD.TOGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.09

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

5.43

+0.79

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGD.TO and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XGD.TOGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.66

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.21

+0.05

Drawdowns

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, roughly equal to the maximum GDX drawdown of -72.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGD.TOGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.55%

-72.75%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.95%

-30.43%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.95%

-30.43%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.82%

-41.75%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

-48.18%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.49%

-25.23%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.30%

-34.38%

+6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

11.70%

-0.77%

Volatility

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) is 14.43%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.21%. This indicates that XGD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGD.TOGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

15.21%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.40%

36.33%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.86%

44.24%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.64%

33.83%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.38%

35.29%

-1.91%

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

XGD.TO vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.60%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.80%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.09%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XGD.TO and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.

XGD.TO is categorized as Precious Metals, while GDX is Gold. XGD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XGD.TO and 0.51% for GDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGD.TO and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer