PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGBE.DE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBUP.DE's -0.06% return.


XGBE.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.04%
YTD
0.32%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-1.12%
10Y*

CBUP.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.96%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XGBE.DE
Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.32%2.73%3.40%7.52%-7.63%
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.06%0.99%2.05%7.83%-11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

0.90

The correlation between XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGBE.DE
XGBE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUP.DE
CBUP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGBE.DECBUP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.19

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

0.48

+0.88

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGBE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.20%, which is greater than CBUP.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGBE.DECBUP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.20%

-12.62%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-3.19%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.62%

-3.58%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-1.90%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.28%

-5.07%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.26%

-0.41%

Volatility

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) is 0.81%, while iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that XGBE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGBE.DECBUP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.24%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

3.66%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

4.18%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.87%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

5.87%

-0.85%

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XGBE.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUP.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGBE.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGBE.DE nor CBUP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUP.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUP.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGBE.DE.

XGBE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index, while CBUP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Green Bond SRI (including Nuclear Power) Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XGBE.DE and 0.20% for CBUP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGBE.DE and CBUP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer