XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XGBE.DE (Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XGBE.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XGBE.DE returned -0.79%/yr vs 5.87%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGBE.DE achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return.
XGBE.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 1.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGBE.DE Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.11% | 2.73% | 3.40% | 7.52% | -16.38% | -0.21% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XGBE.DE
XDWH.DE
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XGBE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 2.24 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 5.74 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGBE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.20%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XGBE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.20% | -40.65% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -9.82% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.62% | -21.11% | +18.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.20% | -21.11% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -0.35% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -7.34% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 3.83% | -2.99% |
Volatility
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) is 0.62%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that XGBE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XGBE.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 4.52% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 10.23% | -7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 14.17% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 13.51% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 15.62% | -10.59% |
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XGBE.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XGBE.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XGBE.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XGBE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XGBE.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer