PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XGBE.DE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than CBU0.DE's -1.09% return.


XGBE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.46%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.47%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-1.09%
10Y*

CBU0.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.73%
6M
-2.16%
YTD
-1.09%
1Y
1.69%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XGBE.DE
Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.47%2.73%3.40%5.91%
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-1.09%4.57%-0.38%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2023

0.72

The correlation between XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XGBE.DE
XGBE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGBE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XGBE.DECBU0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.06

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

0.39

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

1.03

+0.68

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XGBE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XGBE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.20%, which is greater than CBU0.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XGBE.DECBU0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.20%

-6.16%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-4.32%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.62%

-4.32%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.08%

-2.34%

-3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.28%

-1.67%

-8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.63%

-0.78%

Volatility

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) is 0.82%, while iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that XGBE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XGBE.DECBU0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.52%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

4.71%

-1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

5.36%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.05%

5.90%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

5.90%

-0.87%

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XGBE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XGBE.DE nor CBU0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XGBE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index, while CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XGBE.DE and CBU0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer