PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XG7S.DE achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XG7S.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of -0.93%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.49% annualized return.


XG7S.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.23%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
-0.99%
3Y*
-0.74%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
-0.93%

XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
1.88%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.62%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.23%-4.70%2.17%1.03%-13.47%0.52%0.56%7.95%3.41%-5.58%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%-2.88%30.09%-12.09%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XG7S.DE and XESC.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2013

-0.08

The correlation between XG7S.DE and XESC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XG7S.DE
XG7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XG7S.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

1.45

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

4.94

-5.84

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XG7S.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XG7S.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XG7S.DEXESC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

0.98

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.65

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.57

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.32

-0.16

Drawdowns

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XG7S.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG7S.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XG7S.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.08%

-45.38%

+24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-10.88%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.74%

-16.53%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-23.33%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.08%

-38.51%

+17.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.11%

-0.53%

-18.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-8.39%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

3.19%

-1.74%

Volatility

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.DE) is 1.23%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XG7S.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XG7S.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

4.90%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

13.02%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

16.01%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

17.54%

-11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

18.27%

-12.42%

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XG7S.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XG7S.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XG7S.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%
XG7S.DE
Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XG7S.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XG7S.DE.

XG7S.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XG7S.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XG7S.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XG7S.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer