PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XG12.DE achieves a 40.21% return, which is significantly higher than XESC.DE's 9.31% return.


XG12.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.12%
YTD
40.21%
6M
41.26%
1Y
54.18%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
2.56%
YTD
9.31%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XG12.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C
40.21%8.69%-4.44%-8.34%-5.33%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
9.31%22.24%11.06%22.50%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XG12.DE and XESC.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.66

The correlation between XG12.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XG12.DE
XG12.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XG12.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG12.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XG12.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.96

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

6.81

-0.80

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XG12.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XG12.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XG12.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -46.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XG12.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XG12.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-46.74%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.16%

-10.88%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-16.53%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.71%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-9.06%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.01%

3.13%

+5.88%

Volatility

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 12 Circular Economy UCITS ETF 1C (XG12.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) at 3.52%. This indicates that XG12.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XG12.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

3.52%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

13.23%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.66%

16.03%

+11.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.56%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

17.98%

+3.10%

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XG12.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XG12.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XG12.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XG12.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XG12.DE.

XG12.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XG12.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production Select, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XG12.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XG12.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer