PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XFVT.L is traded in GBp, while PRAM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRAM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFVT.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than PRAM.L's 24.37% return.


XFVT.L

1D
2.80%
1M
3.84%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.40%
1Y
55.07%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
6.44%

PRAM.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
24.37%
6M
25.54%
1Y
45.76%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XFVT.L
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C
5.81%57.38%-8.97%-0.07%-37.94%9.05%
PRAM.L
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
24.37%23.15%8.96%4.38%-8.20%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XFVT.L and PRAM.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2021

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFVT.L
XFVT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XFVT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFVT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAM.L
PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFVT.LPRAM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

4.47

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

13.97

-5.12

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFVT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFVT.L and PRAM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFVT.L drawdown since its inception was -87.46%, which is greater than PRAM.L's maximum drawdown of -19.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.L and PRAM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFVT.LPRAM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.46%

-19.53%

-67.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.42%

-10.24%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.89%

-15.77%

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.84%

-5.15%

-58.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.09%

-6.59%

-67.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

3.28%

+3.13%

Volatility

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) is 7.23%, while Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that XFVT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFVT.LPRAM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

9.05%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.63%

17.32%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.92%

19.41%

+8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

17.09%

+11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

17.09%

+8.79%

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFVT.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XFVT.L vs. PRAM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XFVT.L nor PRAM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XFVT.L and PRAM.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.L.

XFVT.L tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while PRAM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.L and 0.10% for PRAM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFVT.L and PRAM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer