XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L
XFVT.L (Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and DEMS.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XFVT.L tracks the STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid while DEMS.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XFVT.L returned 0.52%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for DEMS.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFVT.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEMS.L.
Performance
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFVT.L achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than DEMS.L's 18.13% return.
XFVT.L
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 55.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
DEMS.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- —
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFVT.L Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 5.81% | 57.38% | -8.97% | -0.07% | -37.94% | 33.66% | 13.67% | 0.55% | -6.19% | 36.66% |
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 18.13% | 12.50% | 7.08% | 14.64% | -2.59% | 15.41% | -9.66% | 14.70% | 2.60% | 9.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFVT.L and DEMS.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XFVT.L
DEMS.L
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFVT.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 4.11 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 14.15 | -5.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFVT.L drawdown since its inception was -87.46%, which is greater than DEMS.L's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFVT.L and DEMS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFVT.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.46% | -30.94% | -56.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.42% | -6.47% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.89% | -12.88% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.80% | -14.79% | -37.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.84% | -3.36% | -60.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.09% | -9.10% | -64.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 1.88% | +4.53% |
Volatility
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Vietnam Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XFVT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) at 4.37%. This indicates that XFVT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFVT.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 4.37% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.63% | 9.51% | +10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 11.75% | +16.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 12.85% | +16.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 19.96% | +5.92% |
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFVT.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DEMS.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFVT.L vs. DEMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFVT.L nor DEMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFVT.L and DEMS.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEMS.L is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEMS.L is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XFVT.L.
XFVT.L tracks STOXX Vietnam Total Market Liquid, while DEMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XFVT.L and 0.46% for DEMS.L.
Find the right allocation for XFVT.L and DEMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer