XFRM.L vs. UC15.L
XFRM.L (WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - XFRM.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock while UC15.L tracks the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XFRM.L returned 8.89%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for UC15.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFRM.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XFRM.L is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFRM.L achieves a 36.57% return, which is significantly higher than UC15.L's 21.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XFRM.L having a 8.89% annualized return and UC15.L not far behind at 8.88%.
XFRM.L
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 36.57%
- 6M
- 36.44%
- 1Y
- 56.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 21.19%
- 6M
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFRM.L WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock | 36.57% | 23.14% | 6.70% | -9.42% | 15.17% | 26.88% | -9.12% | 10.10% | -12.43% | 6.62% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.20% | 10.31% | 4.66% | -1.58% | 16.07% | 34.87% | 0.50% | 9.54% | -10.61% | 6.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFRM.L and UC15.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2014 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XFRM.L and UC15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
XFRM.L
UC15.L
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock (XFRM.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFRM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.22 | 6.36 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.95 | 14.16 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFRM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.17 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.77 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.26 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFRM.L drawdown since its inception was -56.89%, which is greater than UC15.L's maximum drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFRM.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFRM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.89% | -51.79% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -4.88% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -11.19% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.87% | -18.05% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.47% | -35.40% | -2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -3.99% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.77% | -20.55% | -10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 2.20% | +1.66% |
Volatility
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Broad Commodities Ex-Agriculture and Livestock (XFRM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) at 4.84%. This indicates that XFRM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFRM.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 4.84% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.44% | 11.93% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.66% | 14.32% | +8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 15.02% | +5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 14.62% | +3.83% |
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFRM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XFRM.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XFRM.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XFRM.L and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XFRM.L.
XFRM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XFRM.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for XFRM.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer