PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFLT vs. USOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFLT vs. USOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLT achieves a -18.15% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 47.45% return.


XFLT

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-18.15%
6M
-13.46%
1Y
-24.43%
3Y*
-4.10%
5Y*
-4.21%
10Y*

USOI

1D
-2.04%
1M
0.59%
YTD
47.45%
6M
44.00%
1Y
46.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLT vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XFLT and USOI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFLT vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLT
XFLT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

USOI
USOI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
USOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLT vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFLTUSOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.35

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

3.92

-4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

9.08

-10.35

XFLT vs. USOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLT Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the USOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLT and USOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFLTUSOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.20

2.08

-3.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.89

-0.87

Drawdowns

XFLT vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLT drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than USOI's maximum drawdown of -19.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLT and USOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFLTUSOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-19.49%

-35.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.67%

-11.90%

-28.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.92%

-5.06%

-29.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.38%

-7.20%

-7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.15%

5.13%

+14.02%

Volatility

XFLT vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) is 3.18%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that XFLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFLTUSOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

10.37%

-7.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

18.34%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

22.46%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

22.61%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.17%

22.61%

+3.56%

Dividends

XFLT vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison

XFLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.77%, less than USOI's 37.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USOI
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN
37.65%27.21%12.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XFLT
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust
20.77%18.23%15.24%13.61%13.86%9.82%10.64%10.63%11.33%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFLT and USOI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOI has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to XFLT (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLT dropped -55.43% vs USOI's -19.49%.

USOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFLT and USOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer