XFIV vs. XTWO
XFIV (BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and XTWO (BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from BondBloxx - XFIV tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index while XTWO tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XFIV returned 3.51%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for XTWO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
XFIV vs. XTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than XTWO's 0.41% return.
XFIV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTWO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFIV vs. XTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.47% | 7.43% | 1.52% | 4.40% | -0.56% |
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.41% | 5.17% | 3.92% | 4.27% | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFIV and XTWO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XFIV and XTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFIV vs. XTWO — Risk / Return Rank
XFIV
XTWO
XFIV vs. XTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFIV | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.52 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 3.78 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 13.59 | -9.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFIV | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 2.52 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.74 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
XFIV vs. XTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, which is greater than XTWO's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and XTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFIV | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.38% | -1.73% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -0.91% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.47% | -1.18% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -0.38% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.40% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.25% | +0.72% |
Volatility
XFIV vs. XTWO - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) at 0.36%. This indicates that XFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFIV | XTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 0.36% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 0.95% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 1.37% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 2.16% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 2.16% | +3.26% |
XFIV vs. XTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XFIV and XTWO have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XFIV vs. XTWO - Dividend Comparison
XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than XTWO's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.82% | 4.05% | 3.92% | 3.63% | 1.06% |
XTWO BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.05% | 4.24% | 4.54% | 4.07% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XFIV and XTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XFIV has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to XTWO (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs XTWO's -1.73%.
On 3-year performance, XTWO leads with 4.12% vs 3.51% for XFIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, XTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTWO has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XFIV and XTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
XTWO has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.82% for XFIV.
XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while XTWO tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index.
XTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XFIV and XTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer