XFIV vs. SMBS
XFIV (BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and SMBS (Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFIV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while SMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XFIV returned 3.51% vs 6.78% for SMBS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XFIV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SMBS.
Performance
XFIV vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SMBS's 0.70% return.
XFIV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMBS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFIV vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.47% | 7.43% | -0.10% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.70% | 8.15% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFIV and SMBS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XFIV and SMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFIV vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank
XFIV
SMBS
XFIV vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XFIV | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.41 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 8.21 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XFIV | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.64 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.18 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
XFIV vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and SMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFIV | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.38% | -3.20% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -2.83% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -1.33% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.84% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.83% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XFIV vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) is 1.09%, while Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that XFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFIV | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.55% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 3.03% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 4.15% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 4.86% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 4.86% | +0.56% |
XFIV vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XFIV vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison
XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than SMBS's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.17% | 4.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.82% | 4.05% | 3.92% | 3.63% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFIV and SMBS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to XFIV (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs SMBS's -3.20%.
On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 3.51% for XFIV. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XFIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XFIV.
SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 3.82% for XFIV.
XFIV is categorized as Government Bonds, while SMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while SMBS tracks Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XFIV and 0.03% for SMBS.
SMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XFIV and SMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer