XFIV vs. SCHQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XFIV (BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XFIV tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XFIV returned 3.51%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for SCHQ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XFIV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.

Performance

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's -0.43% return.

XFIV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.68%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: -1.74%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: -0.72%
• 5Y*: -5.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	-0.47%	7.43%	1.52%	4.40%	-0.56%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-0.43%	5.50%	-6.44%	3.43%	-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XFIV and SCHQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022	0.86

The correlation between XFIV and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFIV vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIV

XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 27
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 17
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFIV	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.59	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	0.91	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.10	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	0.75	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	1.94	+1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIV and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFIV	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.59	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	-0.25	+0.86

Drawdowns

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and SCHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFIV	SCHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.38%	-46.13%	+39.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-7.01%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.47%	-17.65%	+13.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-36.82%	+34.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-26.36%	+24.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	2.70%	-1.73%

Volatility

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) is 1.09%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that XFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFIV	SCHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	2.57%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	5.94%	-3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48%	8.93%	-5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.42%	14.54%	-9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.42%	15.33%	-9.91%

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XFIV vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than SCHQ's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.79%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%
XFIV BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.82%	4.05%	3.92%	3.63%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFIV and SCHQ in my portfolio?

XFIV and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XFIV or SCHQ?

SCHQ has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to XFIV (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

Which ETF is better, XFIV or SCHQ?

On 3-year performance, XFIV leads with 3.51% vs -0.72% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XFIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XFIV or SCHQ?

Over the 3-year period, XFIV has performed better with a 3.51% return vs -0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFIV or SCHQ?

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFIV or SCHQ?

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.82% for XFIV.

What is the main difference between XFIV and SCHQ?

XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XFIV and 0.03% for SCHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.