PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFIV vs. BBBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFIV vs. BBBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than BBBS's 0.75% return.


XFIV

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
10Y*

BBBS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.75%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFIV vs. BBBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XFIV and BBBS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.87

The correlation between XFIV and BBBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFIV vs. BBBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFIV
XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFIV vs. BBBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XFIVBBBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.50

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.23

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

13.15

-9.54

XFIV vs. BBBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the BBBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIV and BBBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XFIVBBBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.50

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

2.36

-1.76

Drawdowns

XFIV vs. BBBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, which is greater than BBBS's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and BBBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFIVBBBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-1.45%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-1.45%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-0.22%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-0.28%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.35%

+0.62%

Volatility

XFIV vs. BBBS - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) at 0.49%. This indicates that XFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFIVBBBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.49%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

1.36%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

1.87%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

2.24%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

2.24%

+3.18%

XFIV vs. BBBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XFIV vs. BBBS - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than BBBS's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%0.00%
XFIV
BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.82%4.05%3.92%3.63%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFIV and BBBS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XFIV has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs BBBS's -1.45%.

On 1-year performance, BBBS leads with 4.65% vs 3.51% for XFIV. On fees, XFIV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBS has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XFIV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBS.

BBBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.82% for XFIV.

XFIV is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBBS is Short-Term Bond. XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XFIV and 0.19% for BBBS.

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFIV and BBBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer