PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XFIV vs. BBBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XFIV vs. BBBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFIV achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly higher than BBBL's -1.75% return.


XFIV

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-0.50%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.06%

BBBL

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.26%
6M
-2.49%
YTD
-1.75%
1Y
0.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.44K$88.79K$60.52K
$3.32M$6.36M$4.71M

XFIV vs. BBBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XFIV and BBBL is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.79

The correlation between XFIV and BBBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XFIV vs. BBBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XFIV
XFIV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBL
BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XFIV vs. BBBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XFIVBBBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.02

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.10

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

0.22

+0.68

XFIV vs. BBBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the BBBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFIV and BBBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFIV vs. BBBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFIV drawdown since its inception was -6.38%, smaller than the maximum BBBL drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFIV and BBBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XFIVBBBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-9.43%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-5.45%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-4.77%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-3.26%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.47%

-1.19%

Volatility

XFIV vs. BBBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XFIV) is 0.91%, while Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that XFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XFIVBBBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

2.09%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

5.97%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

7.64%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

9.66%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

9.66%

-4.30%

XFIV vs. BBBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFIV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBL's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XFIV vs. BBBL - Dividend Comparison

XFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than BBBL's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBL
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF
5.92%5.77%5.19%0.00%0.00%
XFIV
BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.93%4.05%3.92%3.63%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


XFIV and BBBL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBL has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to XFIV (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFIV dropped -6.38% vs BBBL's -9.43%.

On 1-year performance, XFIV leads with 1.15% vs 0.55% for BBBL. On fees, XFIV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XFIV has been the lower-risk option at 0.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XFIV has performed better with a 1.15% return vs 0.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XFIV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBL.

BBBL has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.93% for XFIV.

XFIV is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBBL is Long-Term Bond. XFIV tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 5 Year Target Duration Index, while BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XFIV and 0.19% for BBBL.

XFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFIV and BBBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer