PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XFH.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and TTTX.TO (Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XFH.TO tracks the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD while TTTX.TO tracks the Mirae Asset Global Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XFH.TO returned 24.97% vs 32.80% for TTTX.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XFH.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TTTX.TO.

Performance

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFH.TO achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than TTTX.TO's 7.09% return.

XFH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.77%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
11.20%

TTTX.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
7.09%
6M
7.61%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
XFH.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		10.88%21.68%-0.08%
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF		7.09%18.31%21.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XFH.TO and TTTX.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024

0.03

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XFH.TO
TTTX.TO

Financial Services

22.6%

-

Industrials

20.3%

-

Technology

11.3%
51.0%

Healthcare

9.6%
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
12.4%

Basic Materials

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Communication Services

4.7%
13.1%

Energy

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.6%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Financial Services

XFH.TO
22.6%
TTTX.TO

-

Industrials

XFH.TO
20.3%
TTTX.TO

-

Technology

XFH.TO
11.3%
TTTX.TO
51.0%

Healthcare

XFH.TO
9.6%
TTTX.TO
23.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XFH.TO
8.3%
TTTX.TO
12.4%

Basic Materials

XFH.TO
6.8%
TTTX.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XFH.TO
6.3%
TTTX.TO

-

Communication Services

XFH.TO
4.7%
TTTX.TO
13.1%

Energy

XFH.TO
3.7%
TTTX.TO

-

Utilities

XFH.TO
3.6%
TTTX.TO

-

Real Estate

XFH.TO
2.9%
TTTX.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF

Often compared with XFH.TO:
XFH.TO vs. XEF.TOXFH.TO vs. XIN.TOXFH.TO vs. XLCXFH.TO vs. VIU.TOXFH.TO vs. QQC.TOXFH.TO vs. VEQT.TOXFH.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with TTTX.TO:
TTTX.TO vs. HDIV.TOTTTX.TO vs. AIGO.TOTTTX.TO vs. TEC.TOTTTX.TO vs. BGIE.TOTTTX.TO vs. URATTTX.TO vs. FGEP.TOTTTX.TO vs. TINF.TO

Return for Risk

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XFH.TO
XFH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XFH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
TTTX.TO
TTTX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TTTX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTTX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTTX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TTTX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTTX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XFH.TOTTTX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.00
2.04

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.84
2.87

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.82

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

8.47

+2.22

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the TTTX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFH.TO and TTTX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than TTTX.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFH.TO and TTTX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XFH.TOTTTX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-23.27%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-11.68%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-4.10%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-4.13%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

3.88%

-1.54%

Volatility

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) is 4.21%, while Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF (TTTX.TO) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that XFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTTX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XFH.TOTTTX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.55%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

12.21%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

16.19%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

20.59%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.59%

-4.60%

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFH.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than TTTX.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFH.TO vs. TTTX.TO - Dividend Comparison

XFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than TTTX.TO's 0.10% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTTX.TO
Global X Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index ETF		0.10%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XFH.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.95%2.16%2.47%2.93%2.93%2.38%1.85%2.60%2.86%2.26%2.17%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XFH.TO and TTTX.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XFH.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TTTX.TO.

XFH.TO tracks Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while TTTX.TO tracks Mirae Asset Global Innovative Bluechip Top 10 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XFH.TO and 0.60% for TTTX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XFH.TO and TTTX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer