XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO
XFH.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and PZW.TO (Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF) are both Global Equities funds - XFH.TO tracks the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD while PZW.TO tracks the 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XFH.TO returned 11.20%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for PZW.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XFH.TO achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than PZW.TO's 15.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XFH.TO having a 11.20% annualized return and PZW.TO not far ahead at 11.53%.
XFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 24.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
PZW.TO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 15.70%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XFH.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 10.88% | 21.68% | 12.60% | 18.31% | -6.58% | 12.30% | 0.97% | 23.27% | -10.81% | 17.68% |
PZW.TO Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF | 15.70% | 18.48% | 16.03% | 12.88% | -10.53% | 17.53% | 7.48% | 18.01% | -8.08% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XFH.TO and PZW.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015 | 0.27 |
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Industrials
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Technology
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Healthcare
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Basic Materials
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Consumer Defensive
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Communication Services
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Energy
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Utilities
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Real Estate
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XFH.TO
PZW.TO
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XFH.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.87 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | 13.82 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, roughly equal to the maximum PZW.TO drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFH.TO and PZW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XFH.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -32.45% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -8.50% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | -16.88% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.52% | -22.13% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | -32.45% | -1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -0.67% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -5.72% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.38% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XFH.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) at 2.82%. This indicates that XFH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XFH.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.82% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 10.41% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.52% | 14.20% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 14.67% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 15.91% | +0.08% |
Dividends
XFH.TO vs. PZW.TO - Dividend Comparison
XFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than PZW.TO's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZW.TO Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF | 1.68% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 3.23% | 1.90% | 1.93% | 1.52% | 2.26% | 1.78% | 1.57% | 1.09% | 0.96% |
XFH.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.95% | 2.16% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 2.93% | 2.38% | 1.85% | 2.60% | 2.86% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XFH.TO and PZW.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XFH.TO tracks Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD, while PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for XFH.TO and PZW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer