XEY vs. SFYI
XEY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF) and SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for SFYI.
Performance
XEY vs. SFYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XEY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SFYI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XEY vs. SFYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF | 2.60% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | -2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEY and SFYI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEY vs. SFYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF (XEY) and SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEY vs. SFYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEY drawdown since its inception was -15.60%, which is greater than SFYI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEY and SFYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEY | SFYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.60% | -3.25% | -12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.61% | -3.25% | -8.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -1.26% | -6.18% |
Volatility
XEY vs. SFYI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEY | SFYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 12.99% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 12.99% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 12.99% | +3.29% |
XEY vs. SFYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYI's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEY vs. SFYI - Dividend Comparison
XEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, while SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% |
XEY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Ether ETF | 14.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEY and SFYI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XEY.
XEY has the higher dividend yield at 14.12%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XEY and 0.73% for SFYI.
Find the right allocation for XEY and SFYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer