PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XETOX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XETOX achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 11.60% return.


XETOX

1D
2.58%
1M
0.54%
6M
4.37%
YTD
8.87%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.51%
ALL TIME*
5.04%

GQFPX

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.13%
6M
4.87%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XETOX
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
8.87%21.76%10.32%24.83%-22.82%9.45%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
11.60%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XETOX and GQFPX is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between XETOX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XETOX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XETOX
XETOX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XETOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XETOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XETOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XETOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XETOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XETOXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.80

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

7.14

+0.52

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XETOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XETOX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XETOX drawdown since its inception was -68.63%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XETOX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XETOXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.63%

-16.95%

-51.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-6.28%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-10.57%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.51%

-16.95%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.46%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-3.03%

-21.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.45%

+0.29%

Volatility

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.28%. This indicates that XETOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XETOXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.28%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

8.32%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

10.18%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

12.78%

+5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

12.81%

+7.08%

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XETOX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

XETOX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

XETOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than GQFPX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.52%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XETOX
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
1.01%3.82%6.59%6.25%9.14%6.43%6.91%6.17%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


XETOX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XETOX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to GQFPX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XETOX dropped -68.63% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XETOX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer