PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XETOX vs. ETG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XETOX vs. ETG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XETOX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than ETG's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, XETOX has underperformed ETG with an annualized return of 9.57%, while ETG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.


XETOX

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.26%
YTD
8.92%
6M
10.24%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
9.57%

ETG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.27%
YTD
2.94%
6M
6.30%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XETOX vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XETOX
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
8.92%21.76%10.32%24.83%-22.82%26.65%15.25%36.66%-19.00%13.99%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
2.94%36.92%15.46%21.97%-27.62%33.08%10.08%43.62%-15.90%33.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XETOX and ETG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2004

0.71

The correlation between XETOX and ETG shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XETOX vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XETOX
XETOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XETOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XETOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XETOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XETOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XETOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ETG
ETG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XETOX vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XETOXETGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

1.51

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

2.14

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.38

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.54

5.47

+4.07

XETOX vs. ETG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XETOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ETG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XETOX and ETG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XETOXETGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.51

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.38

-0.16

Drawdowns

XETOX vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XETOX drawdown since its inception was -68.63%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XETOX and ETG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XETOXETGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.63%

-74.76%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-16.64%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-16.95%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.51%

-31.64%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.35%

-51.53%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.45%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-13.48%

-11.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

4.19%

-1.51%

Volatility

XETOX vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund (XETOX) is 4.37%, while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that XETOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XETOXETGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

4.76%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

12.32%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

15.24%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

19.82%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

21.25%

-1.31%

XETOX vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XETOX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

XETOX vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison

XETOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than ETG's 6.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
6.72%6.72%8.03%7.02%9.94%6.02%6.74%6.83%9.08%7.69%8.74%7.93%
XETOX
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Opportunities Fund
1.51%3.82%6.59%6.25%9.14%6.43%6.91%6.17%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XETOX and ETG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to XETOX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XETOX dropped -68.63% vs ETG's -74.76%.

XETOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XETOX and ETG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer