XESX.L vs. SPOL.L
XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and SPOL.L (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XESX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while SPOL.L tracks the MSCI Poland NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L returned 8.41%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for SPOL.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XESX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for SPOL.L.
Performance
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has underperformed SPOL.L with an annualized return of 8.41%, while SPOL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.
XESX.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
SPOL.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 6.57%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 30.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 5.63% | 24.66% | 2.94% | 16.40% | -8.32% | 12.93% | 0.07% | 18.58% | -12.98% | 10.98% |
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 15.71% | 61.27% | -4.98% | 41.52% | -17.96% | 8.30% | -14.19% | -9.68% | -7.69% | 40.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESX.L and SPOL.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XESX.L and SPOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Industrials
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Technology
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Cyclical
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Healthcare
XESX.L
SPOL.L
-
Energy
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Utilities
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Consumer Defensive
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Communication Services
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Basic Materials
XESX.L
SPOL.L
Real Estate
XESX.L
-
SPOL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank
XESX.L
SPOL.L
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XESX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 4.54 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 10.87 | -6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XESX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.87 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and SPOL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XESX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -56.64% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -9.51% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -19.47% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | -46.27% | +22.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -56.64% | +24.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.53% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -21.79% | +7.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.98% | -0.42% |
Volatility
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) is 4.86%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that XESX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XESX.L | SPOL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 7.21% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 17.30% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 23.13% | -7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 27.10% | -9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 25.42% | -7.15% |
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XESX.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison
XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SPOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOL.L iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XESX.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XESX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XESX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.
XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESX.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.
Find the right allocation for XESX.L and SPOL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer