XESX.L vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
XESX.L and URTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XESX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Jan 4, 2007. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both XESX.L and URTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XESX.L or URTH.
Key characteristics
| XESX.L | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.94% | 21.17% |
| 1Y Return | 11.06% | 33.96% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.48% | 7.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.88% | 12.70% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.53% | 10.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.90 | 2.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.31 | 3.79 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.19 | 3.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.06 | 18.03 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.80% | 1.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.99% | 11.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.28% | -34.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.23% | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESX.L and URTH is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XESX.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than URTH's 21.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 8.53%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XESX.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XESX.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XESX.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than URTH's 1.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.29% | 2.95% | 4.84% | 1.68% | 2.85% | 2.41% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.23% | 0.12% | 3.34% | 2.95% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.35% | 2.32% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
XESX.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XESX.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 3.41%. This indicates that XESX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.