XESX.L vs. PRUK.L
XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - XESX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XESX.L returned 8.43%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XESX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
XESX.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 5.63% | 24.66% | 2.94% | 16.40% | -8.32% | 12.93% | 7.80% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XESX.L and PRUK.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XESX.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Technology
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Energy
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
XESX.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
XESX.L
-
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
XESX.L
PRUK.L
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XESX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.76 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 2.52 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XESX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.70 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.05 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.38 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than PRUK.L's maximum drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XESX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -36.10% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -13.05% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -18.00% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | -36.10% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -3.76% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -14.80% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.93% | -0.37% |
Volatility
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) have volatilities of 4.86% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XESX.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 4.82% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 11.72% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 14.14% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.54% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 17.45% | +0.82% |
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XESX.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than PRUK.L's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XESX.L Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XESX.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESX.L.
XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESX.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for XESX.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer