PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XESX.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XESX.L (Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XESX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L returned 11.42%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for CMB1.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XESX.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESX.L achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XESX.L has underperformed CMB1.L with an annualized return of 11.42%, while CMB1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.

XESX.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.95%
YTD
5.66%
6M
6.76%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.42%

CMB1.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.82%
YTD
12.96%
6M
16.50%
1Y
32.53%
3Y*
28.55%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		5.66%28.01%6.19%20.07%-3.31%15.32%3.21%21.72%-10.70%14.52%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		12.96%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XESX.L and CMB1.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2010

0.83

The correlation between XESX.L and CMB1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XESX.L
CMB1.L

Financial Services

26.0%
45.1%

Industrials

22.9%
10.8%

Technology

16.7%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

5.6%
1.1%

Energy

5.4%
8.8%

Utilities

5.0%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
0.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Financial Services

XESX.L
26.0%
CMB1.L
45.1%

Industrials

XESX.L
22.9%
CMB1.L
10.8%

Technology

XESX.L
16.7%
CMB1.L
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XESX.L
10.2%
CMB1.L
10.0%

Healthcare

XESX.L
5.6%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Energy

XESX.L
5.4%
CMB1.L
8.8%

Utilities

XESX.L
5.0%
CMB1.L
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

XESX.L
4.1%
CMB1.L
0.5%

Communication Services

XESX.L
2.4%
CMB1.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

XESX.L
1.8%
CMB1.L
0.6%

Real Estate

XESX.L

-

CMB1.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with XESX.L:
XESX.L vs. IDWR.LXESX.L vs. FEZXESX.L vs. SPX4.LXESX.L vs. URTHXESX.L vs. EUN.LXESX.L vs. FTWG.LXESX.L vs. VEUR.L
Often compared with CMB1.L:
CMB1.L vs. XDEM.LCMB1.L vs. IITU.LCMB1.L vs. H50E.LCMB1.L vs. SPYCMB1.L vs. X7PP.LCMB1.L vs. IQSA.LCMB1.L vs. EQQQ.L

Return for Risk

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XESX.L
XESX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XESX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XESX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XESX.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.18
2.15

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.76
2.94

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.14

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

11.43

-6.23

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESX.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XESX.LCMB1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.15

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.10

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.78

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.23

-0.14

Drawdowns

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESX.L drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than CMB1.L's maximum drawdown of -56.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESX.L and CMB1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XESX.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-56.05%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-10.32%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-15.62%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-24.19%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-36.61%

+5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.25%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-15.26%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.83%

+0.61%

Volatility

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D (XESX.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XESX.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.77%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

12.16%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

15.07%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

17.99%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

20.29%

-2.43%

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

XESX.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

XESX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESX.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1D		2.46%2.52%3.23%2.95%4.84%1.68%2.87%2.41%2.84%2.99%2.23%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

XESX.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

XESX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESX.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESX.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer