XESE.L vs. PRAM.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XESE.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and PRAM.L (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Xtrackers and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XESE.L returned 15.76%/yr vs 21.24%/yr for PRAM.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XESE.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PRAM.L.

Performance

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XESE.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XESE.L is traded in GBP, while PRAM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRAM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XESE.L achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than PRAM.L's 25.01% return.

XESE.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 28.43%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 3.16%
• 10Y*: —

PRAM.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 25.01%
• 6M: 26.19%
• 1Y: 46.45%
• 3Y*: 21.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XESE.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C	12.35%	22.03%	12.08%	-1.92%	-11.39%	-2.79%
PRAM.L Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)	25.01%	23.15%	8.96%	4.38%	-8.20%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XESE.L and PRAM.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2021	0.87

The correlation between XESE.L and PRAM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XESE.L	PRAM.L
Technology	31.3%	42.9%
Financial Services	24.6%	17.0%
Communication Services	13.7%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	8.7%
Industrials	4.8%	8.0%
Healthcare	3.6%	2.7%
Basic Materials	3.4%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.1%
Utilities	0.9%	2.1%
Energy	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESE.L

XESE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
XESE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XESE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XESE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XESE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XESE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRAM.L

PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XESE.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XESE.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.38	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.06	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.45	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	4.51	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	14.23	-6.14

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESE.L and PRAM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESE.L drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than PRAM.L's maximum drawdown of -19.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESE.L and PRAM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XESE.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.68%	-19.53%	-18.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-10.24%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.88%	-15.77%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-4.66%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.30%	-6.59%	-11.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.26%	+0.25%

Volatility

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XESE.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) have volatilities of 8.96% and 9.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XESE.L	PRAM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.96%	9.01%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.06%	17.29%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.71%	19.51%	-1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	17.10%	+1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	17.10%	+1.35%

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESE.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XESE.L vs. PRAM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XESE.L nor PRAM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XESE.L and PRAM.L in my portfolio?

XESE.L and PRAM.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XESE.L or PRAM.L?

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XESE.L or PRAM.L?

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XESE.L.

What is the main difference between XESE.L and PRAM.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XESE.L and 0.10% for PRAM.L.